Re: [PATCH RFC rdma-core] verbs: relaxed ordering memory regions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 09:41:28AM +0200, Haggai Eran wrote:
> +/* Use the new version of ibv_reg_mr only if flags that require it are used. */
> +#define ibv_reg_mr(pd, addr, length, access) ({\
> +	const int optional_access_flags = IBV_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING;
> \

We need to set aside more bits for optional as we can't keep revising
this

> +	struct ibv_mr *__mr; \
> +	\
> +	if (__builtin_constant_p(access) && \
> +	    !((access) & optional_access_flags)) \
> +		__mr = ibv_reg_mr(pd, addr, length, access); \
> +	else \
> +		__mr = ibv_reg_mr_iova2(pd, addr, length, (uintptr_t)addr, \
> +					access); \

Missing brackets around addr

This also wants to be a ?: expression to avoid the ({}) extension

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux