On Fri, 2019-10-04 at 16:49 -0400, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> From: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> There is no reason for a different pad buffer for the two
> packet types.
>
> Expand the current buffer allocation to allow for both
> packet types.
>
> Fixes: f8195f3b14a0 ("IB/hfi1: Eliminate allocation while atomic")
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Kaike Wan <kaike.wan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, applied to for-rc.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
