On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 08:02:50AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 10/7/19 6:59 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > - u8 reserved_at_c0[0x8]; > > + u8 max_sgl_for_optimized_performance[0x8]; > > Should the name of this member variable perhaps be changed into > "max_sgl_for_optimal_performance"? We don't want to force our internal HW/FW names on all uverbs users and drivers. So, the answer is no, it is used for optimized performance, but it is not the proper name for uverbs. Thanks > > Thanks, > > Bart.
