On 9/26/19 11:14 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
On 9/26/19 8:00 AM, Karandeep Chahal wrote:
I understand that you have made "SRP CM timeout dependent on subnet
timeout", but my
question is, why did you add "2" to the subnet timeout? How did you
come up with
this number?
Forgive me but it is not obvious to me after reading the commit message.
Hi Karandeep,
I haven't done any kind of deep research to come up with that value.
My goal was to preserve the CM timeout used by the SRP initiator for
the default opensm subnet timeout value (18). There may be better
choices for the SRP CM timeout.
Bart.
Hi Bart,
My apologies for top-posting.
The problem with adding 2 to SRP CM timeout is that it makes the SRP CM
timeout value far off the subnet timeout value.
Now you can either have a reasonable subnet timeout value and an
unreasonable SRP CM timeout value, or an unreasonable subnet timeout and
a reasonable SRP CM timeout.
-Karan
