Re: [PATCH for-next 2/9] RDMA/hns: Refactor the codes of creating qp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



在 2019/8/28 23:19, Doug Ledford 写道:
> On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 21:14 +0800, Lijun Ou wrote:
>> +static int hns_roce_alloc_recv_inline_buffer(struct hns_roce_qp
>> *hr_qp,
>> +                                            struct ib_qp_init_attr
>> *init_attr)
>> +{
>> +       int ret;
>> +       int i;
>> +
>> +       /* allocate recv inline buf */
>> +       hr_qp->rq_inl_buf.wqe_list = kcalloc(hr_qp->rq.wqe_cnt,
>> +                                            sizeof(struct
>> hns_roce_rinl_wqe),
>> +                                            GFP_KERNEL);
>> +       if (!hr_qp->rq_inl_buf.wqe_list) {
>> +               ret = -ENOMEM;
>> +               goto err;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       hr_qp->rq_inl_buf.wqe_cnt = hr_qp->rq.wqe_cnt;
>> +
>> +       /* Firstly, allocate a list of sge space buffer */
>> +       hr_qp->rq_inl_buf.wqe_list[0].sg_list =
>> +                                       kcalloc(hr_qp-
>>> rq_inl_buf.wqe_cnt,
>> +                                       init_attr->cap.max_recv_sge *
>> +                                       sizeof(struct
>> hns_roce_rinl_sge),
>> +                                       GFP_KERNEL);
>> +       if (!hr_qp->rq_inl_buf.wqe_list[0].sg_list) {
>> +               ret = -ENOMEM;
>> +               goto err_wqe_list;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       for (i = 1; i < hr_qp->rq_inl_buf.wqe_cnt; i++)
>> +               /* Secondly, reallocate the buffer */
>> +               hr_qp->rq_inl_buf.wqe_list[i].sg_list =
>> +                                    &hr_qp-
>>> rq_inl_buf.wqe_list[0].sg_list[i *
>> +                                    init_attr->cap.max_recv_sge];
>> +
>> +       return 0;
>> +
>> +err_wqe_list:
>> +       kfree(hr_qp->rq_inl_buf.wqe_list);
>> +
>> +err:
>> +       return ret;
>> +}
> This function is klunky.  You don't need int ret; at all as there are
> only two possible return values and you have distinct locations for each
> return, so each return can use a constant.  It would be much more
> readable like this:
>
> +static int hns_roce_alloc_recv_inline_buffer(struct hns_roce_qp *hr_qp,
> +                                            struct ib_qp_init_attr *init_attr)
> +{
> +	int num_sge = init_attr->cap.max_recv_sge;
> +	int wqe_cnt = hr_qp->rq.wqe_cnt;
> +       int i;
> +
> +       /* allocate recv inline WQE bufs */
> +       hr_qp->rq_inl_buf.wqe_list = kcalloc(wqe_cnt,
> +                                            sizeof(struct hns_roce_rinl_wqe),
> +                                            GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!hr_qp->rq_inl_buf.wqe_list)
> +               goto err;
> +
> +       hr_qp->rq_inl_buf.wqe_cnt = wqe_cnt;
> +
> +       /* allocate a single sge array for all WQEs */
> +       hr_qp->rq_inl_buf.wqe_list[0].sg_list =
> +                                       kcalloc(wqe_cnt,
> +                                       num_sge *
> +                                       sizeof(struct hns_roce_rinl_sge),
> +                                       GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!hr_qp->rq_inl_buf.wqe_list[0].sg_list)
> +               goto err_wqe_list;
> +
> +       for (i = 1; i < wqe_cnt; i++)
> +               /* give each WQE a pointer to its array space */
> +               hr_qp->rq_inl_buf.wqe_list[i].sg_list =
> +                           &hr_qp->rq_inl_buf.wqe_list[0].sg_list[i * num_sge];
> +
> +       return 0;
> +
> +err_wqe_list:
> +       kfree(hr_qp->rq_inl_buf.wqe_list);
> +err:
> +       return -ENOMEM;
> +}
>
Thanks, I will consider accept your advice and fixes it.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux