On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 04:38:13PM +0530, Potnuri Bharat Teja wrote: > On Tuesday, August 08/06/19, 2019 at 15:18:49 +0530, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 11:09:02AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 04:36:53PM +0530, Potnuri Bharat Teja wrote: > > > > On Monday, July 07/29/19, 2019 at 13:16:20 +0530, Potnuri Bharat Teja wrote: > > > > > On Sunday, July 07/28/19, 2019 at 14:07:49 +0530, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 03:14:24PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:19:28PM +0530, Potnuri Bharat Teja wrote: > > > > > > > > match_device handler is no longer needed after latest device binding changes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > providers/cxgb4/dev.c | 41 ----------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 41 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you know if we can also drop the same code in cxgb3? > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we simply remove cxgb3? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am in talks with the people here. I'll confirm it soon. > > > > > > > > Hi Jason/Doug/Leon, > > > > Chelsio is fine with removing cxgb3. > > > > > > Thanks a lot. > > > > Which parts of cxgb3 can we remove? RDMA, scsi, net or everything? > > I can only say RDMA. For net and scsi parts of cxgb3, the corresponding > maintainers might request for their removal. > Should I send a patch removing RDMA cxgb3? It will be the best variant. Thanks > > Thanks.
