On 5/28/2019 9:09 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:03:42PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
On 28/05/2019 14:37, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Like all other destroy commands, .destroy_cq() call is not supposed
to fail. In all flows, the attempt to return earlier caused to memory
leaks.
This patch converts .destroy_cq() to do not return any errors.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
This patch doesn't apply to my tree for some reason.
I rebased it on top of rdma/wip/jgg-for-next branch.
Can you provide the SHA? I pulled: ea996974 and still get conflicts
applying 2/3.
-Denny
