On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:03:42PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote: > On 28/05/2019 14:37, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Like all other destroy commands, .destroy_cq() call is not supposed > > to fail. In all flows, the attempt to return earlier caused to memory > > leaks. > > > > This patch converts .destroy_cq() to do not return any errors. > > > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This patch doesn't apply to my tree for some reason. I rebased it on top of rdma/wip/jgg-for-next branch. > > Other than that, for the EFA part: > Acked-by: Gal Pressman <galpress@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks > > Thanks Leon
