Re: [PATCH rdma-next 2/2] RDMA/hns: Limit scope of hns_roce_cmq_send()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



在 2019/3/26 20:34, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:00:35PM +0800, oulijun wrote:
>> 在 2019/3/26 19:51, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:33:01PM +0800, oulijun wrote:
>>>> 在 2019/3/19 17:10, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
>>>>> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> The forgotten static keyword causes to the following error to appear
>>>>> while building HNS driver. Declare hns_roce_cmq_send() to be static
>>>>> function to fix this warning.
>>>>>
>>>>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c:1089:5: warning: no previous
>>>>> prototype for _hns_roce_cmq_send_ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>>>>>  int hns_roce_cmq_send(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 6a04aed6afae ("RDMA/hns: Fix the chip hanging caused by sending mailbox&CMQ during reset")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 2 +-
>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
>>>>> index 1c54390e1c85..b13436e97d1f 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
>>>>> @@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ static int __hns_roce_cmq_send(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
>>>>>  	return ret;
>>>>>  }
>>>>>
>>>>> -int hns_roce_cmq_send(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
>>>>> +static int hns_roce_cmq_send(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
>>>>>  			     struct hns_roce_cmq_desc *desc, int num)
>>>>>  {
>>>>>  	int retval;
>>>> Hi, Leon
>>>>
>>>>    The patch [PATCH V9 for-next] RDMA/hns: Dump detailed driver-specific CQ will need to call the function and
>>>>
>>>> need it keep non-static.
>>> You are not using hns_roce_cmq_send() in that v9 patch except of exposing
>>> it through header file. So that v9 needs to be fixed too.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>> No. hns_roce_cmd_send() have done in hns_roce_hw_v2.h.  I merge this patch into my local branch and add the v9. it
>> will build fail.
> Can you please take another look on your v9? Try to search for the
> hns_roce_cmq_send() and see that it is not used.
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10870909/
>
> Thanks
Sorry. you are right. I have analysised it with other guys. it is existed in this series patches.
You have generated it and I will not add it in the v10.
thanks.
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Lijun Ou
>>>>
>>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux