-----"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@xxxxxxxx> wrote: ----- >To: "Dennis Dalessandro" <dennis.dalessandro@xxxxxxxxx> >From: "Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@xxxxxxxx> >Date: 03/13/2019 07:13PM >Cc: "Leon Romanovsky" <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Parav Pandit" ><parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Chuck Lever" <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>, >"Bernard Metzler" <BMT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Steve Wise" ><larrystevenwise@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" ><linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Yuval Shaia" <yuval.shaia@xxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] SIW: Request for Comments > >On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 11:31:41AM -0400, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > >> Can they run NVMEoF? If so then according to Jason [1] that is >meeting the >> unambiguous low bar. > >.. to be considered as part of the RDMA subsystem :) That was not a >bar to show sufficient testing/quality/whatever. > >At plumbgers we agreed the biggest problem with rxe is all the >bugs. How can we decide if siw has less bugs than rxe? > >Jason > Let me rebase to for-next from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git and send a new version with the fixes? Hope to find time tomorrow. This may make it easier to test. Thanks Bernard.
