Re: [PATCH for-next 0/5] IB/hfi1: Random fixes for driver to land in for-next

Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@xxxxxxxxx> · Mon, 10 Dec 2018 13:35:37 -0500

On 12/6/2018 9:58 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:18:50AM -0800, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
Hi Doug and Jason,

These are some misc fixes that I don't feel really warrant going into the
current RC cycle. There is one panic but it's a narrow case to actually happen
so think it's OK to go to for-next.

---

Ashutosh Dixit (1):
       IB/hfi1: Consider LMC in 16B/bypass ingress packet check

Kaike Wan (1):
       IB/hfi1: Ignore LNI errors before DC8051 transitions to Polling state

Michael J. Ruhl (2):
       IB/hfi1: Limit VNIC use of SDMA engines to the available count
       IB/hfi1: Incorrect sizing of sge for PIO will OOPs

Mitko Haralanov (1):
       IB/hfi1: Correctly process FECN and BECN in packets

Applied to for next, but I wonder why you didn't send 'Incorrect
sizing of sge for PIO will OOPs' to for-rc?

Probably could have went either way with this one. It is a day 1 issue. 
Lived with it this long, not easy to hit.

-Denny