Re: [PATCH for-next 0/5] IB/hfi1: Random fixes for driver to land in for-next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:18:50AM -0800, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> Hi Doug and Jason,
> 
> These are some misc fixes that I don't feel really warrant going into the
> current RC cycle. There is one panic but it's a narrow case to actually happen
> so think it's OK to go to for-next.
> 
> ---
> 
> Ashutosh Dixit (1):
>       IB/hfi1: Consider LMC in 16B/bypass ingress packet check
> 
> Kaike Wan (1):
>       IB/hfi1: Ignore LNI errors before DC8051 transitions to Polling state
> 
> Michael J. Ruhl (2):
>       IB/hfi1: Limit VNIC use of SDMA engines to the available count
>       IB/hfi1: Incorrect sizing of sge for PIO will OOPs
> 
> Mitko Haralanov (1):
>       IB/hfi1: Correctly process FECN and BECN in packets
> 

Applied to for next, but I wonder why you didn't send 'Incorrect
sizing of sge for PIO will OOPs' to for-rc?

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux