On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 10:02:43AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 10/18/18 5:51 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Enrich rdmatool with an option to rename IB devices,
> > the command interface follows Iproute2 convention:
> > "rdma dev set [OLD-DEVNAME] name NEW-DEVNAME"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > rdma/dev.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/rdma/dev.c b/rdma/dev.c
> > index e2eafe47..760b7fb3 100644
> > --- a/rdma/dev.c
> > +++ b/rdma/dev.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> > static int dev_help(struct rd *rd)
> > {
> > pr_out("Usage: %s dev show [DEV]\n", rd->filename);
> > + pr_out(" %s dev set [DEV] name DEVNAME\n", rd->filename);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -240,17 +241,51 @@ static int dev_one_show(struct rd *rd)
> > return rd_exec_cmd(rd, cmds, "parameter");
> > }
> >
> > +static int dev_set_name(struct rd *rd)
> > +{
> > + uint32_t seq;
> > +
> > + if (rd_no_arg(rd)) {
> > + pr_err("Please provide device new name.\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
> This is redundant with rd_exec_require_dev which is the required path to
> get to this point.
Sorry for being slow in response, I was on vacation.
----------
This print is intended to warn about missing "new name" and it is not
checked by rd_exec_require_dev()
To emphasize it:
diff --git a/rdma/dev.c b/rdma/dev.c
index 760b7fb3..468ae686 100644
--- a/rdma/dev.c
+++ b/rdma/dev.c
@@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ static int dev_set_name(struct rd *rd)
uint32_t seq;
if (rd_no_arg(rd)) {
+ pr_err("hello world\n");
pr_err("Please provide device new name.\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
Produces the following output:
[leonro@server iproute2]$ ./rdma/rdma dev set mlx5_0 name
hello world
Please provide device new name.
So how will we progress from here? Should I respin?
Thanks
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
