On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 07:43 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/17/18 12:20 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > The WARN_ON() is pointless as the rport is placed in SDEV_TRANSPORT_OFFLINE
> > at that time, so no new commands can be submitted via srp_queuecommand()
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 7 -------
> > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> > index 0b34e909505f..5a79444c2f3c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> > @@ -1334,13 +1334,6 @@ static void srp_terminate_io(struct srp_rport *rport)
> > struct scsi_device *sdev;
> > int i, j;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Invoking srp_terminate_io() while srp_queuecommand() is running
> > - * is not safe. Hence the warning statement below.
> > - */
> > - shost_for_each_device(sdev, shost)
> > - WARN_ON_ONCE(sdev->request_queue->request_fn_active);
> > -
> > for (i = 0; i < target->ch_count; i++) {
> > ch = &target->ch[i];
>
> Although I had explained before why I think that warning is not
> pointless, I agree with this change because the legacy block layer is
> going away. Anyway:
>
> Acked-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Thanks, applied to for-next.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
