On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 17:18 +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 12:07 PM
> > To: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Leon Romanovsky
> > <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; RDMA mailing list <linux-
> > rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Daniel Jurgens <danielj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 1/3] RDMA/cma: Skip netdev and port checks
> > while searching for listener
> >
> > On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 14:19 +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > Hi Doug, Jason,
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 1:32 AM
> > > > To: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jason Gunthorpe
> > > > <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; RDMA mailing list <linux-
> > > > rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Daniel Jurgens <danielj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Parav
> > > > Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Subject: [PATCH rdma-next 1/3] RDMA/cma: Skip netdev and port checks
> > > > while searching for listener
> > > >
> > >
> > > Please drop this patch. I happen to send older version of the patch.
> > > Will send out v1.
> >
> > Are you sending a v1 of the entire series or just the first patch (so I know
> > how to mark Patchworks)?
> >
>
> Only first patch to be resend. But my tests for dual and single port and other regression tests by Leon considers all the 3 patches.
> So I prefer entire series again in this case for simplicity for Leon too, unless Leon has different opinion.
>
OK, I've dropped this series from patchworks, thanks :-)
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
