RE: [PATCH rdma-next 1/3] RDMA/cma: Skip netdev and port checks while searching for listener

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 12:07 PM
> To: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Leon Romanovsky
> <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; RDMA mailing list <linux-
> rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Daniel Jurgens <danielj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 1/3] RDMA/cma: Skip netdev and port checks
> while searching for listener
> 
> On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 14:19 +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > Hi Doug, Jason,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 1:32 AM
> > > To: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jason Gunthorpe
> > > <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; RDMA mailing list <linux-
> > > rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Daniel Jurgens <danielj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Parav
> > > Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: [PATCH rdma-next 1/3] RDMA/cma: Skip netdev and port checks
> > > while searching for listener
> > >
> >
> > Please drop this patch. I happen to send older version of the patch.
> > Will send out v1.
> 
> Are you sending a v1 of the entire series or just the first patch (so I know
> how to mark Patchworks)?
> 
Only first patch to be resend. But my tests for dual and single port and other regression tests by Leon considers all the 3 patches.
So I prefer entire series again in this case for simplicity for Leon too, unless Leon has different opinion.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux