Re: mlx5 order 9/10 allocations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Jun 21, 2018, at 1:14 PM, Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:48:16AM +0300, Alexey Lyashkov wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> while a lustre testing I have seen an very high ordered allocations was done by mlx5 driver.
>> Similar bug reported agaist mlx4 driver in Lustre ticket https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10736.
>> As i see both fails related to the SGE array buffer allocation (sorry, i don’t know a good terms for it).
>> But it uses a continues space, instead of fragmented.
>> I have several questions about it
>> What a reason for it? why don’t use a fragmented allocation and merge it logically as before for mlx4?
> 
> I don't know the reasons for it, but we are working to avoid such large
> allocations, for example see commit 88ca8be0037 "IB/mlx5: Implement fragmented
> completion queue (CQ)"
Soon we are going to do it for QPs of mlx5 and mlx4 as well.
> 
> Thanks
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux