Re: mlx5 order 9/10 allocations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:48:16AM +0300, Alexey Lyashkov wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> while a lustre testing I have seen an very high ordered allocations was done by mlx5 driver.
> Similar bug reported agaist mlx4 driver in Lustre ticket https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10736.
> As i see both fails related to the SGE array buffer allocation (sorry, i don’t know a good terms for it).
> But it uses a continues space, instead of fragmented.
> I have several questions about it
> What a reason for it? why don’t use a fragmented allocation and merge it logically as before for mlx4?

I don't know the reasons for it, but we are working to avoid such large
allocations, for example see commit 88ca8be0037 "IB/mlx5: Implement fragmented
completion queue (CQ)"

Thanks

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux