Re: [PATCH] RDMA/hns: Use structs to describe the uABI instead of opencoding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:46:55PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:39:42PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Open coding a loose value size is not acceptable for describing
> > the uABI in RDMA. Provide the missing struct.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >  drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_pd.c | 5 ++++-
> >  include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h             | 5 +++++
> >  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > hns team: This patch goes along with the remarks in my prior email,
> > structs should always be used with hns_roce_ib_alloc_pd_resp. Please
> > ensure whatever you come up with follows that principle.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jason
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_pd.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_pd.c
> > index bdab2188c04a9a..4b41e041799cae 100644
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_pd.c
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> >
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/pci.h>
> > +#include <uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h>
> >  #include "hns_roce_device.h"
> >
> >  static int hns_roce_pd_alloc(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, unsigned long *pdn)
> > @@ -77,7 +78,9 @@ struct ib_pd *hns_roce_alloc_pd(struct ib_device *ib_dev,
> >  	}
> >
> >  	if (context) {
> > -		if (ib_copy_to_udata(udata, &pd->pdn, sizeof(u64))) {
> > +		struct hns_roce_ib_alloc_pd_resp uresp = {.pdn = pd->pdn};
> > +
> > +		if (ib_copy_to_udata(udata, &uresp, sizeof(uresp))) {
> >  			hns_roce_pd_free(to_hr_dev(ib_dev), pd->pdn);
> >  			dev_err(dev, "[alloc_pd]ib_copy_to_udata failed!\n");
> >  			kfree(pd);
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h b/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h
> > index 4df5b79c9e11a3..a464d7945ebb48 100644
> > +++ b/include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h
> > @@ -64,4 +64,9 @@ struct hns_roce_ib_alloc_ucontext_resp {
> >  	__u32	qp_tab_size;
> >  	__u32	reserved;
> >  };
> > +
> > +struct hns_roce_ib_alloc_pd_resp {
> > +	__u32 pdn;
> > +};
> 
> Don't we want to pad this struct to 64bits?

It isn't padded right now..

I have another series that adds the missing padding. Can't make that
series until we actually have a properly described uapi.

If I recall, it turns out the padding is not technically required here
anyhow.

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux