RE: [PATCH RFC rdma-next 1/2] RDMA/nldev: add provider-specific resource tracking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 07:33:53PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:30:32AM -0700, Steve Wise wrote:
> > > Each provider can register a "fill entry" function with the restrack
core.
> > > This function will be called when filling out a resource, allowing the
> > > provider to add provider-specific details.  The details consist of a
> > > table of nested attributes, that are in the form of "key, value"
tuple.
> > > The key nlattr must be strings, and the value nlattr can be one of
> > > provider attributes that are generic, but typed, allowing the
nlmessage
> > > to ve validated.  Currently the types include string, s32, u32, x32,
s64,
> > > u64, and x64. The inclusion of x, s, and u variants for numeric
attributes
> > > allows the user tool to print the number in the desired format.
> > >
> > > More attrs can be defined as they become needed by providers.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >  drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c  | 40
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  include/rdma/restrack.h          | 10 ++++++++++
> > >  include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > >  3 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c
b/drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c
> > > index 192084c..933df61 100644
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c
> > > @@ -95,8 +95,28 @@
> > >  	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_PD_ENTRY]		= { .type =
> NLA_NESTED },
> > >  	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_LOCAL_DMA_LKEY]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
> > >  	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_RES_UNSAFE_GLOBAL_RKEY] = { .type =
> NLA_U32 },
> > > +	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_PROVIDER]		= { .type =
> NLA_NESTED },
> > > +	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_PROVIDER_ENTRY]	= { .type =
> NLA_NESTED },
> > > +	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_PROVIDER_STRING]	= { .type =
> NLA_NUL_STRING,
> > > +				    .len =
> RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_PROVIDER_STRLEN },
> > > +	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_PROVIDER_D32]		= { .type = NLA_S32 },
> > > +	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_PROVIDER_U32]		= { .type = NLA_U32 },
> > > +	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_PROVIDER_X32]		= { .type = NLA_U32 },
> > > +	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_PROVIDER_D64]		= { .type = NLA_S64 },
> > > +	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_PROVIDER_U64]		= { .type = NLA_U64 },
> > > +	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_PROVIDER_X64]		= { .type = NLA_U64 },
> > > +	[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_PAD]			= { },
> >
> > RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_PAD ????
> 
> This was supposed to have been done earlier..
> 

It wasn't clear whether we needed it.  Leon sez 0 is fine.

> Seperate patch please, and change every caller of nla_put_u64_64bit to
> use the new constant.
> 

Yea ok.

> And I think it has to be 0 for ABI compat, doesn't it?
> 

I guess so, since 0 was used originally.

Steve.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux