Hi Greg & Co, A question has come up in the infiniband/rdma space about what SPDX license headers to use for some of our files. I see in commit e2be04c7f9958dde770eeb8b30e829ca969b37bb you added this header: --- a/include/uapi/rdma/ib_user_sa.h +++ b/include/uapi/rdma/ib_user_sa.h @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) */ /* However, following the matching guidelines at spdx.org, I don't get to the same conclusion. The license in this file does not have the same 'disclaimer' text as the reference BSD-2-Clause, which sounds like it shouldn't match based on guideline 2.1.1 ? Specifically, the so-called 'OpenIB.org BSD license' is a mash up of the first half of the 2 clause BSD license with the disclaimer replaced with the disclaimer from the MIT license. As I read the SPDX rules this license seems like it needs a new tag? Alternatively, we can keep using the BSD-2-Clause tag if it was determined that is correct for some reason? Can you shed any light on this topic? Thanks, Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
