On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 03:39:53PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 14:36 -0600, Steve Wise wrote: > > > > > > BTW, if you can get a v5 of just this patch using the license indicators > > > before Leon responds to my email, we can get things in the right way > > > from the beginning ;-) > > > > > > > So it would look something like this? The copyrights are from cma.c, which is the origin of the contents of this new header. > > > > /* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause) */ > > /* Copyright (c) 2005 Voltaire Inc. All rights reserved. > > * Copyright (c) 2002-2005, Network Appliance, Inc. All rights reserved. > > * Copyright (c) 1999-2005, Mellanox Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. > > * Copyright (c) 2005-2006 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. > > */ > > > > > > Yep, pretty much. Although, I think the BSD in the file might have been > the BSD 2 clause. Jason is more familiar with the BSD variants than I > am. Jason? Hmm.. Actually no, the OpenIB license we use does not match any existing SPDX identifier, so we can't take code covered under that license and apply SPDX at this time. The issue is that the standard license in the kernel is the start of the standard BSD 2 clause license followed by the end of the standard MIT license. >From what I understand about the SPDX rules on their web site, this means it is no match to any existing license I can find (and I checked the raw text in their git repo) I supposed we should talk to the SPDX people and get the tags we need? Maybe I'll look at that.. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
