On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 15:05 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 14:01 -0600, Steve Wise wrote:
> > > > > Why the big copyright instead of the new copyright headers?
> > > >
> > > > I modeled it after core_priv.h
> > >
> > > It just makes another file we have to audit and change later. Anyway,
> > > I'll accept it as is, but I think we need to start using the kernel
> > > license indicators instead.
> >
> > I wasn't aware of the new license indicators. Feel free to fix it up.
>
> There's only a few things I won't fixup when I'm taking a patch. A
> maintainer should never add a SoB line, and they shouldn't set anyone's
> copyright license. It's because these two acts are actually legally
> binding. It's like signing someone else' signature on a contract.
>
BTW, if you can get a v5 of just this patch using the license indicators
before Leon responds to my email, we can get things in the right way
from the beginning ;-)
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDDAttachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
