Re: [PATCH rdma-core] Remove the obsolete libibcm library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 09:32:27AM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On 1/2/2018 9:26 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 09:18:59AM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >> On 12/28/2017 12:30 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 01:19:45PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 02:31:32PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >>>>> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The libibcm library was marked as obsolete long time ago,
> >>>>> the following patch is first step before removing ucm from
> >>>>> the kernel.
> >>>>
> >>>> I understand the distros will not want to loose libibcm in their
> >>>> stable releases.
> >>>>
> >>>> It might make more sense instead to just not build libibcm by default
> >>>> with a cmake option but still keep the sources..
> >>>
> >>> We are not removing it from the stable branches, so if they want to keep it
> >>> till last person who used this library dies, they are free to do it.
> >>>
> >>> The disabled build doesn't give much benefit at all. It will be dead code exactly
> >>> as now, but without any alert that it is broken. Most possible, it will be broken
> >>> till some distro will notice it.
> >>
> >> Since when has it been broken and how is it broken ? Last I knew it
> >> worked but was not used by anything in tree.
> >
> > Hal,
> >
> > Where did you see me saying that it is broken?
> >
> > I said that it WILL be broken if we don't compile it by default.
>
> OK but that's not how I interpreted what you wrote:
> "It will be dead code exactly as now, but without any alert that it is
> broken."
>
> Anyhow, if distro still wants to include this, wouldn't they build and
> test it ?

It depends on them, not all distribution are going to support it. I see
no difference between this library (libibcm) and any other abandoned library.

Thanks

>
> -- Hal
>
> > Thanks
> >
> >>
> >> -- Hal
> >>
> >>> Exactly as some distros have EOL, this libibcm library came to its EOL.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Jason

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux