Le 15/11/2017 à 18:37, Leon Romanovsky a écrit : > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 06:22:33PM +0100, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote: >> >> Le 15/11/2017 à 06:56, Leon Romanovsky a écrit : >>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 07:57:55PM +0100, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote: >>>> Builds rdma-core in -Og/Debug mode and use abi-dumper to generate 1 xml >>>> per .so.*.* file. >>>> Do not use .so file directly. Providers have no symbol exported >>>> and cause abi-dumer to exit with an error. >>> mlx4/mlx5 do export. >>> >>> Thanks >> >> Yes but they also export versiones .so files >> $ ll build-abi/lib/libmlx* >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 nmorey users 17 Nov 14 19:51 build-abi/lib/libmlx4-rdmav16.so -> libmlx4.so.1.0.16 >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 nmorey users 12 Nov 14 19:51 build-abi/lib/libmlx4.so -> libmlx4.so.1 >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 nmorey users 17 Nov 14 19:51 build-abi/lib/libmlx4.so.1 -> libmlx4.so.1.0.16 >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 nmorey users 276600 Nov 14 19:51 build-abi/lib/libmlx4.so.1.0.16 >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 nmorey users 17 Nov 14 19:51 build-abi/lib/libmlx5-rdmav16.so -> libmlx5.so.1.2.16 >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 nmorey users 12 Nov 14 19:51 build-abi/lib/libmlx5.so -> libmlx5.so.1 >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 nmorey users 17 Nov 14 19:51 build-abi/lib/libmlx5.so.1 -> libmlx5.so.1.2.16 >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 nmorey users 690712 Nov 14 19:51 build-abi/lib/libmlx5.so.1.2.16 >> >> So the .so are ignored (specially the -rdmav16) but the standalone ones aren't > We are supporting static builds too (*.a and not *.so), can the script > be extended to check them too? > > Thanks Does that changes something ? As long as the specific build-abi build generates the .so, it should be sufficient to check the ABI. Wether someone build with static options or not. Unless there are other static libs I'm missing. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
