> -----Original Message----- > From: Leon Romanovsky [mailto:leon@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 1:46 PM > To: Ruhl, Michael J <michael.j.ruhl@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] ibacm: acmp retry issues > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:43:00AM -0500, Michael J. Ruhl wrote: > > While testing the retry mechanism for the acmp provider, I observed > > that the retry event_wait() did not appear to be working correctly. > > After studying the issue a bit more, I discovered that there were a > > couple of issues. > > > > This patch set addresses those issues. > > > > v2 - added patch for MONOTONIC time base > > v3 - Updated and cleaned various type cast issues > > > > --- > > > > Michael J. Ruhl (4): > > ibacm: Fix an incorrect expiration check for the retry timer > > ibacm: Calculate correct tv_nsec value in event_wait() > > ibacm: Fix a retry loop calculation race condition > > ibacm: Use MONOTONIC time base to avoid timer expiration issues > > > > > > ibacm/linux/osd.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++--------- > > ibacm/prov/acmp/src/acmp.c | 12 +++++++----- > > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > Can you please use [PATCH rdma-core ..] format for rdma-core patches? Hi Leon, Yes, I will reformat. Is there a place to put patch set version information? i.e [PATCH rdma-core v4, x/y]? (should I just drop it for this patch set?) Thanks, Mike > We are using patchworks to handle queue and it is so handy to filter > patches in such way: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/list/?q=rdma-core > > Thanks > > > -- > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
