On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:34:25AM +0200, Yishai Hadas wrote: > >I don't think we should have a dealloc for this, since it is ibv_pd it > >should go through the normal ibv_dealloc_pd. Having two deletors for > >the same type is too hard to use. > > I'm fine with that, just to be clear here, the application will still need > to call twice for ibv_dealloc_pd() once to free the parent domain collection > and later to free the protection name, this will make it fully symmetric > from allocation/free point of view. Yes Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
