Hi Mellanox, All, I've been reading XRC code, currently implemented only by Mellanox. I have a few questions regarding specifications vs. implementation. (1) The protocol specifies: 11.6.3.2 AFFILIATED ASYNCHRONOUS ERRORS ... The following describes the new Affiliated Asynchronous Errors for XRC TGT QPs: * XRC Domain Violation - Responder's Receive Queue detected an XRC Domain that does not match the XRC Domain of the XRC SRQ. * Invalid XRCETH - Responder detected that the XRC SRQ does not exist or is not in the right state or wire protocol violation. I don't see any dedicated entries in the enum ib_event_type. Why? How, do you currently treat these errors? (2) The protocol specifies: 11.4.2.1 POLL FOR COMPLETION ... Output Modifiers: ... * Local XRC TGT QP Number. Returned only for completions of WRs posted to XRC SRQs. I don't see any dedicated field in the struct ib_wc. Why? How, do you currently return this value, if at all? (3) The protocol specifies: 11.4.2.1 POLL FOR COMPLETION A new "XRC violation error" is returned for requests that caused the responder to return a "NAK-Invalid RD Request" NAK. This could have been caused by either a Remote XRC Domain Violation or an XRCETH Violation as detailed in the transport section. What entry from the enum ib_wc_status do you use for this? Thanks, Ram -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
