On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 15:42 +0000, Ruhl, Michael J wrote:
> > > have the same issue. Specific index validation is needed, and
> > > should probably
> >
> > be
> > > addressed with a different patch.
> >
> > .doit exists for RDMA_NL_LS and for other .dumpit exists, so no
> > actual
> > check is needed.
> >
> > if you want to be on the safe side, please extend is_nl_valid().
> > IMHO,
> > it will keep code cleaner, the checks in one localized place and
> > execution
> > is not mixed with the validity checks.
>
> Leon,
>
> I do not disagree with you on this. My patch is to fix the Oops, and
> make
> sure it can't happen with the current code.
>
> Extending is_nl_valid() to be more complete seems to be out of scope
> for
> the current issue of making the Oops go away.
>
> I can probably work on is_nl_valid(), but I will need much more time
> to make sure
> that it is correct, and don't feel that I can get it done with in the
> appropriate
> time frame (i.e. sometime this week).
I agree with Michael that tweaking this code to be optimal versus
plainly failsafe is a patch for another day. I've taken this one.
Thanks Michael.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
