On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 17:01 +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 12:56 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Sun, 2017-10-08 at 13:03 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > It is a little bit strange to ask from user to decide if his
> > > adapter
> > > supports SRQ or not.
> > >
> > > It should be automatically.
> >
> > I think Bart's intent is that the driver not use SRQ as the default
> > behavior even if the adapter supports it, so querying the adapter
> > for
> > support and enabling it if it exists would not achieve his desired
> > result. This would then be used to override that behavior. Is
> > that
> > correct Bart?
>
> Hello Leon and Doug,
>
> The changes realized by this patch are:
> - Instead of using SRQ as default, use non-SRQ mode as default.
> - If SRQ has been chosen as default, and if SRQ is not supported,
> fall back
> to non-SRQ mode (see also the if (IS_ERR(sdev->srq)) ... code).
>
> Please let me know if you have any further questions about this
> patch.
Nope, I'm good.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
