On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 12:56 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-10-08 at 13:03 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > It is a little bit strange to ask from user to decide if his adapter
> > supports SRQ or not.
> >
> > It should be automatically.
>
> I think Bart's intent is that the driver not use SRQ as the default
> behavior even if the adapter supports it, so querying the adapter for
> support and enabling it if it exists would not achieve his desired
> result. This would then be used to override that behavior. Is that
> correct Bart?
Hello Leon and Doug,
The changes realized by this patch are:
- Instead of using SRQ as default, use non-SRQ mode as default.
- If SRQ has been chosen as default, and if SRQ is not supported, fall back
to non-SRQ mode (see also the if (IS_ERR(sdev->srq)) ... code).
Please let me know if you have any further questions about this patch.
Bart.��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
