Hi Leon, > For countless number of times, and it is already two digits count, I asked you in > private and public do NOT answer in top-posting format on the public mailing > lists, but it seems like you don't care and prefer do not respect participants of > those lists. > > What can we do to stop it? Premoderation of your posts? VP approval of EVERY > post? Anything else? There was no particular point in Stephen's email that I could answer as interspersed response. Answering it at bottom and top appeared same to me in cases where it is not interspersed. Seems top posting even for such case is very serious concern than communicating the point. I apologize again for such violation. I will review email responses twice now before sending to make sure they are not top posted. I understood from [1] that why bottom posting is efficient. I didn't realize that top-posting is disrespectful to participants as you mentioned above. I didn't mean to disrespects the participants. Again I will follow bottom posting. [1] http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
