On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 07:09:14PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > If you only intention is to force to outgoing port and loopback externally, I can suggest you different route table configuration without NAT. > Let me know. Hi Parav, For countless number of times, and it is already two digits count, I asked you in private and public do NOT answer in top-posting format on the public mailing lists, but it seems like you don't care and prefer do not respect participants of those lists. What can we do to stop it? Premoderation of your posts? VP approval of EVERY post? Anything else? > > Parav > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-rdma- > > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephen Bates > > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 1:18 PM > > To: linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sagi Grimberg > > <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Max Gurtovoy <maxg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: [linux-rdma and rdma-core]: Unable to perform rdma_connect in > > loopbacked configuration > > <...> > > [1] > > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fserverf > > ault.com%2Fquestions%2F127636%2Fforce-local-ip-traffic-to-an-external- > > interface&data=02%7C01%7Cparav%40mellanox.com%7Ce2f8f804df59419cc25 > > a08d4fec1b338%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C63641 > > 3555309452199&sdata=E2MQTCbSTHiUxmIAVZITBCPgKTEWBTY2%2BWVqHuSJ > > KlY%3D&reserved=0 And if we are talking about your emails, please work with IT to configure proper replies without links overriding. In meanwhile, please STOP using public mailing lists till you fix these two issues. Thanks > > > > > > {.n + +% lzwm b 맲 r zX ݙ ܨ} Ơz &j:+v zZ+ +zf h ~ i z w ? > > & )ߢf
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
