On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 01:51:41PM +0300, Yuval Shaia wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 01:29:04PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 01:21:17PM +0300, Yuval Shaia wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 01:49:49PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Remove call to BUG() in case wrong node_type was provided.
> > > > This flow is unreachable, because node_types are supplied
> > > > from specific enum.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c | 14 +++++---------
> > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c
> > > > index 21fef6b6d4f3..0d359a482b13 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c
> > > > @@ -180,17 +180,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_rate_to_mbps);
> > > > __attribute_const__ enum rdma_transport_type
> > > > rdma_node_get_transport(enum rdma_node_type node_type)
> > > > {
> > > > - switch (node_type) {
> > > > - case RDMA_NODE_IB_CA:
> > > > + if (node_type == RDMA_NODE_IB_CA)
> > > > return RDMA_TRANSPORT_IB;
> > > > - case RDMA_NODE_RNIC:
> > > > +
> > > > + if (node_type == RDMA_NODE_RNIC)
> > > > return RDMA_TRANSPORT_IWARP;
> > >
> > > Looking at for-next, there is case for RDMA_NODE_USNIC.
> > > Which branch this patch is based on?
> >
> > for-next, in case of RDMA_NODE_USNIC, we are using the
> > RDMA_TRANSPORT_USNIC_UDP return type.
>
> I see, but then i would expect to see these lines in the patch:
> - case RDMA_NODE_USNIC:
> - return RDMA_TRANSPORT_USNIC;
Please see patch #7 from this series.
Thanks
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
