On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 01:21:17PM +0300, Yuval Shaia wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 01:49:49PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Remove call to BUG() in case wrong node_type was provided.
> > This flow is unreachable, because node_types are supplied
> > from specific enum.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c | 14 +++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c
> > index 21fef6b6d4f3..0d359a482b13 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c
> > @@ -180,17 +180,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_rate_to_mbps);
> > __attribute_const__ enum rdma_transport_type
> > rdma_node_get_transport(enum rdma_node_type node_type)
> > {
> > - switch (node_type) {
> > - case RDMA_NODE_IB_CA:
> > + if (node_type == RDMA_NODE_IB_CA)
> > return RDMA_TRANSPORT_IB;
> > - case RDMA_NODE_RNIC:
> > +
> > + if (node_type == RDMA_NODE_RNIC)
> > return RDMA_TRANSPORT_IWARP;
>
> Looking at for-next, there is case for RDMA_NODE_USNIC.
> Which branch this patch is based on?
for-next, in case of RDMA_NODE_USNIC, we are using the
RDMA_TRANSPORT_USNIC_UDP return type.
>
> > - case RDMA_NODE_USNIC_UDP:
> > - return RDMA_TRANSPORT_USNIC_UDP;
> > - default:
> > - BUG();
> > - return 0;
> > - }
> > +
> > + return RDMA_TRANSPORT_USNIC_UDP;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_node_get_transport);
> >
> > --
> > 2.14.0
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
