On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Daniel Jurgens <danielj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 5/21/2017 7:13 PM, James Morris wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 May 2017, Dan Jurgens wrote:
>>
>>> security/security.c | 385 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> This looks wrong -- merge problem?
>
> Yes, it was a merge problem. I added back the per field initialization of the security head hooks. Paul stripped this (and the same problem in patch 0004) himself before merging.
>
>>
>>
>>> + if (pps->alt.state != IB_PORT_PKEY_NOT_VALID) {
>>> + get_pkey_and_subnet_prefix(&pps->alt,
>>> + &pkey,
>>> + &subnet_prefix);
>>> +
>>> + ret = enforce_qp_pkey_security(pkey,
>>> + subnet_prefix,
>>> + sec);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + goto out;
>> The above if/goto is unnecessary.
>
> Right.
>
> Paul, do you want me to fix this with a new patch?
Since this isn't a build or runtime failure, just a style correction,
I'll leave it up to you: either post a 10/9 patch which converts all
the jumps-to-return to just return, or respin/resubmit the patches.
If you do the latter, just resubmit the affected patches and not the
whole patchset.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
