----- Original Message ----- > From: "Max Gurtovoy" <maxg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Doug Ledford" <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Leon Romanovsky" <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Bart Van Assche" <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx>, hch@xxxxxx, "keith busch" <keith.busch@xxxxxxxxx>, > linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, vladimirk@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 12:14:33 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] arbitrary sg lists support > > > > On 5/1/2017 9:50 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: > > On Sun, 2017-04-23 at 17:35 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > >>> > >>> I actually answered here: > >>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg46412.html > >> > >> Did anything progress with the debug? > >> > >>> > >>> Sagi, > >>> As you mentioned the IO path is different in SRP and iSER so IMO we > >>> should start with SRP debugging. NVMf is similar to iSER (and not > >>> SRP) > >>> and that's why I think we can apply this patchset. > >> > >> My concern is that this might be broken due to the fact that we don't > >> know what triggers this. > >> > >>> > >>> If you want to wait till we debug SRP issue it's fine, but I can't > >>> repro > >>> it in my lab so it can take longer. > >> > >> I'd prefer not to take a non-mandatory feature that is not guaranteed > >> to work. > > > > Indeed. I've left this series on hold (actually, I've removed it from > > patchworks). When we get this straightened, then please resubmit. > > > > Sure, no problem. > > Max. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Max The setup is in place, send me whatever it is you need for debug here. Patches, instrumentation etc. I will be happy to gather the debug. Regards Laurence -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html