On 5/1/2017 9:50 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
On Sun, 2017-04-23 at 17:35 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
I actually answered here:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg46412.html
Did anything progress with the debug?
Sagi,
As you mentioned the IO path is different in SRP and iSER so IMO we
should start with SRP debugging. NVMf is similar to iSER (and not
SRP)
and that's why I think we can apply this patchset.
My concern is that this might be broken due to the fact that we don't
know what triggers this.
If you want to wait till we debug SRP issue it's fine, but I can't
repro
it in my lab so it can take longer.
I'd prefer not to take a non-mandatory feature that is not guaranteed
to work.
Indeed. I've left this series on hold (actually, I've removed it from
patchworks). When we get this straightened, then please resubmit.
Sure, no problem.
Max.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
