Quite some additional newlines and I'm not really fond of the
->poll_batch() name. It's a bit confusing with ->poll() and we also have
irq_poll(). But the only thing that would come to my mind is
complete_batch() which "races" with ->complete().
What about ->check_completions()? After all, that is what both ->poll()
and ->poll_batch do but with a different stop condition, no ?
So it would also be easy to merge the two: both tag and batch are
unsigned int which could be called "cookie", and add a flag to tell how
to interpret it (as a tag or a batch limit).
e.g. something like:
+typedef int (check_completions_fn)(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *,
enum blk_mq_check_flags, /* flag (TAG or BATCH) */
unsigned int); /* Target tag or batch limit */
I'd rather not to unite poll/poll_batch, but if this is something
that people want I can definitely do it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
