On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 12:23:01PM -0800, Vishwanathapura, Niranjana wrote:
> Add rdma netdev interface to ib device structure allowing rdma netdev
> devices to be allocated by ib clients.
> Define HFI VNIC interface between hardware independent VNIC
> functionality and the hardware dependent VNIC functionality.
This commit message could be a bit clearer.
The alloc_rdma_netdev multiplexer is inteded as a new general
interface and this adds a protocol definition for ethernet VNIC on
OPA.
The hope is that ipoib can follow the same example and use the same
alloc_rdma_netdev entry point. Hopefully Mellanox will look at this
patch as I have talked to them in the past about doing this...
It looks like HFI turned out fairly well, the driver code and higher
level code have a reasonably nice split in my quick look.
> IB_DEVICE_RAW_SCATTER_FCS = (1ULL << 34),
> + IB_DEVICE_RDMA_NETDEV_HFI_VNIC = (1ULL << 35),
What is this called HFI_VNIC anyhow? Shouldn't this be OPA_VNIC? There
is nothing really HFI specific, right?
> +/* hfi vnic rdma netdev's private data structure */
> +struct hfi_vnic_rdma_netdev {
> + struct rdma_netdev rn; /* keep this first */
> + /* followed by device private data */
> + char *dev_priv[0];
> +};
> +
> +static inline void *hfi_vnic_priv(const struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct rdma_netdev *rn = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> + return rn->clnt_priv;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void *hfi_vnic_dev_priv(const struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct rdma_netdev *rn = netdev_priv(dev);
Shouldn't this be hfi_vnic_rdma_netdev ?
> + return rn + 1;
And this should be rn->dev_priv ?
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
