On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 06:40:04PM +0000, Hefty, Sean wrote: > > From: Moni Shoua <monis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > When allocating a port number for binding to a rdma_id, assuming the > > allocation is not for a specific port, the rule is to allow only ports > > that were not in use before by any other rdma_id. > > > > This condition is too strong to achieve the goal of a unique 5 tuple > > rdma_id. Instead, we can compare current rdma_id with other rdma_id for > > difference in one of destination port, source address and destination > > address to allow port reuse. > > > > Signed-off-by: Moni Shoua <monis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks Sean for your prompt response. I truly appreciate it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
