On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 16:16 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > From: Moni Shoua <monis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > When allocating a port number for binding to a rdma_id, assuming the > allocation is not for a specific port, the rule is to allow only > ports > that were not in use before by any other rdma_id. > > This condition is too strong to achieve the goal of a unique 5 tuple > rdma_id. Instead, we can compare current rdma_id with other rdma_id > for > difference in one of destination port, source address and destination > address to allow port reuse. > > Signed-off-by: Moni Shoua <monis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> Applied to -next, thanks. -- Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx> GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
