> > I am referring to the creation of an ioctl handling framework that is suitable for use by the rdma > cm, ib cm (if kept), verb devices, and non-verbs drivers that do not plug into the kernel verbs > framework. The kernel clients are the items I mentioned. Having a common ioctl handling framework > will maximize code reuse. > > It looks too generic for RDMA subsystem. What does it make this IOCTL framework specific to RDMA? I'm not sure how something can be too generic. Everything I mentioned above exists as part of the RDMA subsystem. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
