> -----Original Message----- > From: Doug Ledford [mailto:dledford@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 8:43 PM > To: leon@xxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Mark Bloch <markb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next V2 5/5] IB/core: Integrate IB address > resolution module into core > Can you build netlink in and then init the ib_addr module after the > netlink init is complete? Wouldn't that resolve the dependency ordering > issue without changing the module names? Sorry, but I don't understand what do you mean by this. If you would like to keep the current module structure (ib_core.ko and ib_addr.ko) The only way to use ibnl from within addr.c is to move the ibnl initialization to addr.c and build netlink.c as part of ib_addr.ko, but it seems kind of strange if ib_addr is responsible to initialize ibnl. > > -- > Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx> > GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD > Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
