On 4/29/2016 1:12 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:27:30PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote: >>> You can never have a SendOnly_FullMember join. Once you are FullMember, >>> you are no longer SendOnly. >>> >>> Is a NonMember (assuming here that NonMember is referring to what the CA >>> is listed as according to the SM) even allowed to join, either as >>> SendOnly or FullMember? I would have thought if the SM listed that CA >>> as a NonMember, that any joins would be flat rejected and NonMember join >>> states wouldn't make any sense. >> >> There is now a new SendOnlyFullMember option added by IBTA MgtWG post >> IBA 1.3. > > As I understand it, this is done because the SendOnly Non-Member > essentially has useless reference counting semantics. FullMember > allows the group to be auto-created and continue to exist even if > there is only one SendOnly member. My understanding of this option is similar to the above. -- Hal > Jason > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
