On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:27:30PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > You can never have a SendOnly_FullMember join. Once you are FullMember, > > you are no longer SendOnly. > > > > Is a NonMember (assuming here that NonMember is referring to what the CA > > is listed as according to the SM) even allowed to join, either as > > SendOnly or FullMember? I would have thought if the SM listed that CA > > as a NonMember, that any joins would be flat rejected and NonMember join > > states wouldn't make any sense. > > There is now a new SendOnlyFullMember option added by IBTA MgtWG post > IBA 1.3. As I understand it, this is done because the SendOnly Non-Member essentially has useless reference counting semantics. FullMember allows the group to be auto-created and continue to exist even if there is only one SendOnly member. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
