On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 08:36:24AM +0100, Hans Westgaard Ry wrote: > Hi, > I cloned git://git.openfabrics.org/~grockah/perftest.git today and found > quite a few new commits but not this patch. > > Am I looking in the wrong repository or are there problems with this patch ? Gil/Or Your feedback will be appreciated. > > Hans > > On 12/09/2015 10:30 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > >On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:11:55AM +0100, Hans Westgaard Ry wrote: > >>Sorry but I didn't see that "something" gobbled part of the mail. > >>The correct lines are (as in the original): > >> > >>src/perftest_resources.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ > >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > >> > >>diff --git a/src/perftest_resources.c b/src/perftest_resources.c > >>index cb915e0..4d8e6c0 100755 > >>--- a/src/perftest_resources.c > >>+++ b/src/perftest_resources.c > >>@@ -25,6 +25,12 @@ static enum ibv_wr_opcode opcode_atomic_array[] = {IBV_WR_ATOMIC_CMP_AND_SWP,IBV > >> struct perftest_parameters* duration_param; > >> struct check_alive_data check_alive_data; > >>+/* > >>+ * Flag to trig call to print_report_bw > >>+ * The flag is set in signal_handler and tested/reset in run_iter_bw_infinitely > >>+ */ > >>+static volatile int trig_print_report_bw = 0; > >>+ > >> /****************************************************************************** > >> * Beginning > >>@@ -3214,7 +3220,15 @@ int run_iter_bw_infinitely(struct pingpong_context *ctx,struct perftest_paramete > >> /* main loop for posting */ > >> while (1) { > >>- > >>+ if (trig_print_report_bw) { > >>+ duration_param->tcompleted[0] = get_cycles(); > >>+ print_report_bw(duration_param,NULL); > >>+ duration_param->iters = 0; > >>+ alarm(duration_param->duration); > >>+ duration_param->tposted[0] = get_cycles(); > >>+ trig_print_report_bw = 0; > >>+ } > >>+ > >> /* main loop to run over all the qps and post each time n messages */ > >> for (index =0 ; index < num_of_qps ; index++) { > >>@@ -4213,11 +4227,7 @@ void check_alive(int sig) > >> ******************************************************************************/ > >> void catch_alarm_infintely(int sig) > >> { > >>- duration_param->tcompleted[0] = get_cycles(); > >>- print_report_bw(duration_param,NULL); > >>- duration_param->iters = 0; > >>- alarm(duration_param->duration); > >>- duration_param->tposted[0] = get_cycles(); > >>+ trig_print_report_bw = 1; > >> } > >Thanks, it looks good, > >Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> > >> > >>On 12/09/2015 09:52 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > >>>On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:33:11AM +0100, Hans Westgaard Ry wrote: > >>>>Any comments on this patch ? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>On 11/18/2015 01:27 PM, Hans Westgaard Ry wrote: > >>>>>The test uses a signal-handler to periodically print a line of report. > >>>>>+ if (trig_print_report_bw) { > >>>>>+ duration_param->tcompleted[0] =et_cycles(); > >>>>>+ print_report_bw(duration_param,NULL); > >>>>>+ duration_param->iters =; > >>>Excuse me, what did you mean by the line above? > >>> > >>>>>+ alarm(duration_param->duration); > >>>>>+ duration_param->tposted[0] =et_cycles(); > >>>>>+ trig_print_report_bw =; > >>>And this line too. > >>> > >>-- > >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > >>the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html