Hi,
I cloned git://git.openfabrics.org/~grockah/perftest.git today and found
quite a few new commits but not this patch.
Am I looking in the wrong repository or are there problems with this patch ?
Hans
On 12/09/2015 10:30 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:11:55AM +0100, Hans Westgaard Ry wrote:
Sorry but I didn't see that "something" gobbled part of the mail.
The correct lines are (as in the original):
src/perftest_resources.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/perftest_resources.c b/src/perftest_resources.c
index cb915e0..4d8e6c0 100755
--- a/src/perftest_resources.c
+++ b/src/perftest_resources.c
@@ -25,6 +25,12 @@ static enum ibv_wr_opcode opcode_atomic_array[] = {IBV_WR_ATOMIC_CMP_AND_SWP,IBV
struct perftest_parameters* duration_param;
struct check_alive_data check_alive_data;
+/*
+ * Flag to trig call to print_report_bw
+ * The flag is set in signal_handler and tested/reset in run_iter_bw_infinitely
+ */
+static volatile int trig_print_report_bw = 0;
+
/******************************************************************************
* Beginning
@@ -3214,7 +3220,15 @@ int run_iter_bw_infinitely(struct pingpong_context *ctx,struct perftest_paramete
/* main loop for posting */
while (1) {
-
+ if (trig_print_report_bw) {
+ duration_param->tcompleted[0] = get_cycles();
+ print_report_bw(duration_param,NULL);
+ duration_param->iters = 0;
+ alarm(duration_param->duration);
+ duration_param->tposted[0] = get_cycles();
+ trig_print_report_bw = 0;
+ }
+
/* main loop to run over all the qps and post each time n messages */
for (index =0 ; index < num_of_qps ; index++) {
@@ -4213,11 +4227,7 @@ void check_alive(int sig)
******************************************************************************/
void catch_alarm_infintely(int sig)
{
- duration_param->tcompleted[0] = get_cycles();
- print_report_bw(duration_param,NULL);
- duration_param->iters = 0;
- alarm(duration_param->duration);
- duration_param->tposted[0] = get_cycles();
+ trig_print_report_bw = 1;
}
Thanks, it looks good,
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 12/09/2015 09:52 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:33:11AM +0100, Hans Westgaard Ry wrote:
Any comments on this patch ?
On 11/18/2015 01:27 PM, Hans Westgaard Ry wrote:
The test uses a signal-handler to periodically print a line of report.
+ if (trig_print_report_bw) {
+ duration_param->tcompleted[0] =et_cycles();
+ print_report_bw(duration_param,NULL);
+ duration_param->iters =;
Excuse me, what did you mean by the line above?
+ alarm(duration_param->duration);
+ duration_param->tposted[0] =et_cycles();
+ trig_print_report_bw =;
And this line too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
