On 01/19/2016 04:20 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On 12/29/2015 07:46 AM, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>> On 12/29/2015 7:21 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>>> On 12/29/2015 12:43 PM, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>>>> This handles issue pointed out by Matan Barak <matanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 145d9c541032 ('IB/core: Display extended counter set if
>>>> available')
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <hal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> again, remove the blank line after the fixes tag.
>>>
>>> Also, I am not that the way Doug is setting the branch for pull would
>>> preserve commit IDs when
>>> the offending patch landed in Linus tree. If this is the case, we should
>>> put your patch in 2nd pull
>>> request and have the right commit ID there. Please check with Doug.
>>
>> Doug ?
>>
>
> The commit id should be preserved as long as the commit ID you reference
> is from my k.o tree and a k.o/ branch. It only changes if I rebase, and
> I don't do that on k.o branches that I've pushed to k.o (I have,
> however, once rebased a k.o/ branch that I had only pushed to
> github...and I try not to do that and will try even harder in the future
> not to, but I did do it once).
>
Oh, and I picked this up. Thanks.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
