On 12/29/2015 07:46 AM, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On 12/29/2015 7:21 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> On 12/29/2015 12:43 PM, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>>> This handles issue pointed out by Matan Barak <matanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Fixes: 145d9c541032 ('IB/core: Display extended counter set if
>>> available')
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <hal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> again, remove the blank line after the fixes tag.
>>
>> Also, I am not that the way Doug is setting the branch for pull would
>> preserve commit IDs when
>> the offending patch landed in Linus tree. If this is the case, we should
>> put your patch in 2nd pull
>> request and have the right commit ID there. Please check with Doug.
>
> Doug ?
>
The commit id should be preserved as long as the commit ID you reference
is from my k.o tree and a k.o/ branch. It only changes if I rebase, and
I don't do that on k.o branches that I've pushed to k.o (I have,
however, once rebased a k.o/ branch that I had only pushed to
github...and I try not to do that and will try even harder in the future
not to, but I did do it once).
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
